Tangible 60 portfolio
30% gold · 30% equities · 15% silver · 15% commodities · 10% cash · quarterly rebalance · physical coin costs applied · computed 2026-07-19 with the same engine the app runs.
| Crisis | Real return | Max drawdown | PP ratio | Recovery | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The 2008 financial crisis | +29.5% | −31.9% | 1.29× | 22.0 months | Read |
| The 2020 COVID crash | +13.7% | −16.7% | 1.14× | 71 days | Read |
| The 1970s inflation decade | +154.6% | −30.1% | 2.55× | 3.1 years | Read |
| The dot-com bust | +27.1% | −20.9% | 1.27× | 15.1 months | Read |
| The Volcker double-dip | −42.0% | −43.7% | 0.58× | not recovered in window | Read |
| The eurozone debt crisis | −5.1% | −11.8% | 0.95× | not recovered in window | Read |
| The 2022 inflation and rate shock | −6.5% | −18.1% | 0.93× | not recovered in window | Read |
| The 1987 crash | −17.9% | −18.0% | 0.82× | not recovered in window | Read |
Averaged across eight crises, a Tangible 60 portfolio returned +19.2% in real terms per window. Its best window was the 1970s inflation decade (+154.6%); its hardest was the Volcker double-dip (−42.0%), and the deepest real drawdown, −43.7%, came in the Volcker double-dip. Figures are real, after quarterly rebalancing and physical coin costs.
Open this mix in the stress-tester All mix profiles Crisis outcomes
Averages weight each crisis window equally; they summarize history, not a forecast. Sources and definitions: methodology.
Educational estimates, not financial advice